1. How satisfied were you with the plenary session, on scale from 1-6? (1=poor, 6=excellent)
 
 
 
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
1a. Plenary session Tuesday
 
       Comments to Plenary Session Tuesday
 
 
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
1b. Plenary session Wednesday
 
       Comments to Plenary Session Wednesday
2. Workstreams on Tuesday
 
  2a. How satisfied were you with the workstream sessions on Tuesday, on scale from 1-6? (1=poor, 6=excellent)
   
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
 
  2b. Which workstream was your primary and secondary preference on Tuesday? (1=primary, 2=secondary)
 
 
 
  1
  2
A - IM
B - Human Capital in IM
C - GIS
D - Drilling DM
E - Exploration & Development
F - Production
G - Schlumberger Room
H - Landmark Room
 
Comments to workstream sessions Tuesday
 
3. Workstreams on Wednesday
 
  3a. How satisfied were you with the workstream sessions on Wednesday, on scale from 1-6? (1=poor, 6=excellent)
   
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
 
  3b. Which workstream was your primary and secondary preference on Wednesday? (1=primary, 2=secondary)
 
 
 
  1
  2
A - IM
B - Human Capital in IM
C - GIS
D - Drilling DM
E - Exploration & Development
F - Production
G - Schlumberger Room
H - Landmark Room
 
Comments to workstream sessions Wednesday
 
4. Which workstream topics did you find to be the most interesting?
 
5. What kind of workstream topics would you like to see at future ECIM conferences?
 
6. How do you feel about the total time spent, the length of the conference? (1=Too short, 2=Just about right, 3=Too long)
 
  1
  2
  3
7. How would you rate this conference compared to other conferences of this type that you have attended? (1=poor, 6=excellent)
 
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
8. In what ways could this conference be improved?
 
9. Overall, how satisfied were you with the hotel accommodation and services? (1=poor, 6=excellent)
 
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
10. Comments to the informal program - conference dinner and ice breaker
 
11. Do you plan to attend the ECIM Conference next year?       Yes  No